The Benefits Of Industrial Rope Access
Comparative studies:
1. Rope access vs. Scaffolding: (Project: painting the building facade -surface preparation, inspection and eventual repair of masonry, applying primer, applying paint)
Scaffolding |
Rope access |
||||||
|
|
||||||
Total: 126 h |
Total: 97 h |
2. Rope access vs. Aerial working platform: (Project: glazed facade sealent installation – entire surface inspection, sealent installation where needed)
Working platform |
Rope access |
||||||
|
|
||||||
Total: 11 h |
Total: 3 h |
3. Rope access vs. Scaffolding vs. Aerial working platform: (Project: dyeing the ceiling and supportive steel structure of an industrial building: surface preparation, priming, painting
Scaffolding |
Rope access |
Working platform |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total: 434 h |
Total: 220 h |
Total: 278 h |
To all this we add those features of industrial rope access that are not measurable in figures:
- The possibility of working in places with difficult access, narrow spaces, etc. where other access methods may not be used.
- Not blocking the access ways with scaffolding or working platforms.
- Not affecting the normal operation of objectives during the works.
- Not requiring free space or straight land underneath the working point.
Statistically, industrial rope access is the safest method of working at height.

